Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What's more effective; 3-2 or 2-3 tacks?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What's more effective; 3-2 or 2-3 tacks?

    Considering the fact I don't use tier 3 tacks a lot, if I was to spam one of them against Ceramics and MOABS, which one should I use?

  • #2
    Originally posted by Hausemaster
    3-2 always
    3-2 is better against spaced bloons (including moab class bloons)
    2-3 is better against grouped bloons (including moab class bloons)

    Comment


    • #3
      3-2 is better for the moab and bfb early on. However, for grouped moabs 2-3 is much better. It fires faster than a 3-2 and hits 3x the targets.
      (Type something here...............)

      Comment


      • #4
        Just buy 3-0. Its range upgrades are bad either way.
        This is Street Fighter V again.

        Comment


        • #5
          Blades shoot faster than tacks!?
          I saw a button that said edit post signature so I did.

          I forgot I have a Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJ0...Fww_A1N9cIWF_g

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by BTD Battles Scrub View Post
            Blades shoot faster than tacks!?
            Yes. Blade shooter shoots once every 0.51 seconds. Meanwhile tack shoots once every 0.66 seconds.
            (Type something here...............)

            Comment


            • #7
              2-3 can solo yellows on a lot of maps.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Luke Carney View Post
                2-3 can solo yellows on a lot of maps.
                no it can't.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Jaiden View Post

                  no it can't.
                  yes it can. I soloed a bunch of yellows on battle river today

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Hausemaster

                    Yes because every map is going to be battle river/battle park lol
                    yes because I totally said that it works on every map. It works pretty well on maps like patch park and concrete alley.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      In cost, you can place more 3-2 (Preferably 3-0) on a map at once for lower cost. We can consider this.

                      A map can squeeze in 78 Tack Shooters. (Only edges of the map)
                      A 3-0 Tack would fill up the 78 placements faster than a 2-3 Tack.

                      360 for Base Cost



                      3-0 Tack

                      360
                      210
                      300
                      500
                      (3-1)
                      (3-2)
                      In total, this is 1370, or 1695 with Range Upgrades).

                      2-3 Tack

                      360
                      210
                      300
                      100
                      225
                      680
                      In total, this is 1875 (Or 1360 with no attack speed upgrades, which is pointless to have.)

                      In theory, 3-0 and 4-0 is better for leads and groups on a corner
                      On the other hand, 2-3 and 2-4 is better for spaced out bloons.
                      Last edited by Speedy05; 27-08-17, 12:52 PM. Reason: Graph messed up.
                      This is Street Fighter V again.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Speedy05 View Post
                        In cost, you can place more 3-2 (Preferably 3-0) on a map at once for lower cost. We can consider this.

                        A map can squeeze in 78 Tack Shooters. (Only edges of the map)
                        A 3-0 Tack would fill up the 78 placements faster than a 2-3 Tack.

                        360 for Base Cost



                        3-0 Tack

                        360
                        210
                        300
                        500
                        (3-1)
                        (3-2)
                        In total, this is 1370, or 1695 with Range Upgrades).

                        2-3 Tack

                        360
                        210
                        300
                        100
                        225
                        680
                        In total, this is 1875 (Or 1360 with no attack speed upgrades, which is pointless to have.)

                        In theory, 3-0 and 4-0 is better for leads and groups on a corner
                        On the other hand, 2-3 and 2-4 is better for spaced out bloons.
                        that's completely wrong. the 2-3 is better against grouped since it has 4 pierce, while the 3-0 only has 1 or 2, and since the 3-2 attacks 16 targets at once it can take down blacks and whites, but not greens, which is the other way around for the 2-3

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          After watching Jajajosh I decided to use what he did and it comes that generally Tacks do better in clumps instead of being spread. Does anyone know if RingOfFire does more than one hit to a MOAB?

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X